▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-097 · Vishnu Shankar Jain
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-097AF-LDG-097
Key figureActive · publicRecord AF-LDG-097

VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN.

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Defense lawyer, Advocate

New Delhi, Delhi

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
15 Aug Represented Asaram in later legal proceedings; publicly stat...
Followed up
FIR 20 Aug Represented Asaram in later legal proceedings; publicly stat...
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
01
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
Vishnu Shankar Jain is a prominent Supreme Court advocate who has publicly defended Asaram Bapu, claiming his conviction was a miscarriage of justice. Jain is widely known for representing Hindu petitioners in major religious site disputes and has argued that the media prejudiced Asaram's trial.
On record

Vishnu Shankar Jain is a well-known advocate practicing in the Supreme Court of India, recognized for his representation of Hindu parties in high-profile civil and religious disputes, including the Gyanvapi Mosque and Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi cases. Working alongside his father, Senior Advocate Hari Shankar Jain, he has built a legal career focused on constitutional law and religious rights. While not serving as the trial counsel of record, Jain has been an active legal commentator on the convictions of Asaram Bapu.

Jain has publicly argued that the criminal trials against Asaram Bapu in Jodhpur and Ahmedabad were heavily influenced by media trials, which prejudiced the public and the judiciary against the spiritual leader. He has expressed the opinion that the charges of sexual assault under the POCSO Act were built on inconsistent testimony and that the trial courts failed to properly address these gaps, leading to a miscarriage of justice. Jain has supported petitions seeking a review of the convictions in the higher courts.

His public defense of Asaram Bapu has been controversial, drawing criticism from child rights groups and legal experts who point to the extensive evidence and multiple witness statements validated by the courts. However, Jain has maintained that every citizen, including controversial religious figures, is entitled to a fair trial free from media influence and political pressure. He has advocated for stricter guidelines on media reporting of ongoing trials to prevent prejudice.

Jain continues to practice law in New Delhi, representing various organizations and public figures in constitutional and civil matters. His comments on the Asaram case are frequently cited by the godman's followers to support their claims of innocence and conspiracy. His involvement represents the legal support that Asaram Bapu continues to receive from nationalist legal circles.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-097
Jurisdiction
Key figure
Sealed
Public record
Status
Active · public