▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-131 · Tushar Mehta
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-131AF-LDG-131
Key figureActive · publicRecord AF-LDG-131

TUSHAR MEHTA.

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Other, Solicitor General of India

New Delhi, Delhi

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
15 Aug Opposed Asaram's bail application in the Supreme Court (Janu...
Followed up
FIR 20 Aug Opposed Asaram's bail application in the Supreme Court (Janu...
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
00
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
Tushar Mehta is the Solicitor General of India who represented the government in opposing Asaram Bapu's bail applications in the Supreme Court. Mehta argued that the godman's release would pose a severe threat to public order and witness safety.
On record

Tushar Mehta is a distinguished Indian Senior Advocate who has served as the Solicitor General of India since October 2018. With a long career representing the Union of India and various state governments in complex constitutional and criminal matters, Mehta is recognized as one of the country's top legal minds. In late 2024 and early 2025, Mehta led the state's opposition to Asaram Bapu's medical bail petitions in the Supreme Court.

Appearing before the division bench, Mehta argued that Asaram Bapu's requests for medical bail were part of a systematic strategy to secure release and delay the final disposal of his appeals. He presented reports from state prison doctors indicating that Asaram's health was stable and could be managed within the Jodhpur jail. Mehta also emphasized the history of witness intimidation, arguing that releasing the godman would endanger the surviving witnesses and the victim's family.

During the January 2025 hearings, when the Supreme Court bench was inclined to grant interim bail on humanitarian grounds, Mehta insisted on placing strict conditions on the release. He argued that Asaram must be restricted from using his bail to meet followers, hold public discourses, or travel outside the designated medical facility in Maharashtra, ensuring that the bail did not lead to public order challenges or witness harassment.

Mehta continues to represent the government in major constitutional, regulatory, and criminal matters before the Supreme Court. His involvement in the Asaram case represents the state's ongoing commitment to defending the convictions and ensuring that high-profile convicts are held accountable under the law. His arguments regarding witness safety are a significant detail in the judicial record of the case.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-131
Jurisdiction
Key figure
Sealed
Public record
Status
Active · public