▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · POCSO §23 observed Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-014 · Surat Devotee
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-014AF-LDG-014
SurvivorIdentity sealedRecord AF-LDG-014

SURAT DEVOTEE.

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Student, Chhindwara ashram · age 16 at offence

Jodhpur, Rajasthan

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
15 Aug 2013
Followed up
FIR 20 Aug 2013
Linked cases
02
Sources cited
04
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
The court is the first place I was believed.
On record

The survivor was sixteen years old at the time of the offence. Four years passed before she felt able to name what had happened. The testimony, recorded under sealed identity provisions, was admitted as evidence in the Jodhpur trial that produced the conviction now under appeal.

This ledger entry preserves the on-record voice of the survivor as referenced in court papers. Identifying details have been removed in compliance with POCSO §23. Editors have cross-checked every detail against the original deposition before publication.

The Asaram Files maintains this record so that the testimony cannot be removed by suppression, intimidation, or future revisionism. The mirror is updated whenever a verified statement is added.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-014
Jurisdiction
Surat devotee · 1997–2006
Sealed
POCSO §23
Status
On record