▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-139 · Sima Prajapati
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-139AF-LDG-139
Family witnessStatus unknownRecord AF-LDG-139

SIMA PRAJAPATI.

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Family witness, Asaram cases

Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
2014
Followed up
Case part of broader witness a...
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
01
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
Sima Prajapati is a prosecution witness who survived a shooting attack along with her husband Om Prakash Prajapati in Hoshangabad in 2014. The attack was planned by Asaram's hit squad to intimidate the family.
On record

Sima Prajapati was a former devotee of Asaram Bapu who was listed as a prosecution witness in the sexual assault trials. A resident of Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh, she had observed the administrative activities of the local ashram and agreed to testify regarding the movement of female disciples, making her a target for the cult's followers.

In 2014, Sima and her husband, Om Prakash Prajapati, were shot at by unidentified gunmen at their home. The couple survived the attack, which was part of a series of violent incidents targeting witnesses across six states. The shooting was designed to force the family to turn hostile and withdraw their statements, illustrating the extreme pressure faced by women testifying against the godman.

The investigation into the shooting was completed after the capture of hitman Tamraj in 2025, who confessed to executing the attack on instructions from ashram managers. The local police prosecuted the case under the Arms Act and the Indian Penal Code, providing the family with security guards during the trials.

Sima remained a prosecution witness despite the trauma and the ongoing security risks. She continues to live in Madhya Pradesh with her family under police protection. Her case is recorded as a significant detail in the narrative of the witness intimidation campaign, highlighting the physical risks faced by women who stood against the cult.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-139
Jurisdiction
Family witness
Sealed
Public record
Status
Status unknown