▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-141 · Rape accuser woman (unnamed)
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-141AF-LDG-141
Witness · prosecutionRecord AF-LDG-141

RAPE ACCUSER WOMAN (UNNAMED).

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Prosecution witness, Surat rape case

Gujarat

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
2014-01
Followed up
Resurfaced after approximately...
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
01
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
An unnamed woman who accused Asaram Bapu of rape went missing along with her family for over a week in January 2014 before resurfacing. Her disappearance highlighted the intense pressure and security risks faced by direct complainants.
On record

This unnamed individual is one of the complainants who filed a formal rape complaint against Asaram Bapu in Gujarat in late 2013. A former disciple who resided at the Motera ashram, she provided detailed statements to the police regarding the sexual abuse she faced, making her a vital witness for the prosecution in the Gandhinagar trials.

In January 2014, while the investigation was ongoing, the complainant, along with her husband and son, disappeared from their residence in Gujarat, failing to contact the police or their lawyers. The disappearance caused significant concern, with media outlets reporting that they had been abducted or threatened by Asaram's followers to force the withdrawal of the case.

Following a week-long search by the Gujarat Police SIT, the complainant and her family resurfaced safely, reporting that they had temporarily left their home to escape the intense pressure, media focus, and constant threat calls from unidentified devotees. The incident highlighted the psychological and physical strain faced by survivors.

The complainant continued her cooperation with the prosecution, and her statements were part of the legal proceedings. Her identity has been protected by law enforcement under POCSO and IPC guidelines, and she continues to live under security. Her case remains a significant example of the extreme pressure faced by direct survivors during the trials.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-141
Jurisdiction
Witness · prosecution
Sealed
Public record
Status
On record