▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-093 · Raju Ramachandran
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-093AF-LDG-093
Key figureActive · publicRecord AF-LDG-093

RAJU RAMACHANDRAN.

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Defense lawyer, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India

New Delhi, Delhi

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
15 Aug Part of Asaram's defense team
Followed up
FIR 20 Aug Part of Asaram's defense team
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
01
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
Raju Ramachandran is a Senior Advocate and former Additional Solicitor General of India who briefly represented Asaram Bapu in the Supreme Court. Ramachandran presented arguments regarding the godman's health, though the court rejected his bail petitions.
On record

Raju Ramachandran is a senior advocate practicing in the Supreme Court of India who served as the Additional Solicitor General of India from 2002 to 2004. Known for his expertise in constitutional and criminal law, Ramachandran has served as an amicus curiae in several landmark cases, including the 2002 Gujarat riots cases and the Mumbai terror attack trials. In 2014, he was retained by Asaram Bapu's legal team to present a bail petition before the Supreme Court.

Ramachandran's legal strategy focused on seeking interim relief on medical grounds, presenting diagnostic records to show that the elderly spiritual leader required specialized treatment for neurological and cardiac conditions. He argued that the Jodhpur jail lacked the necessary medical facilities to manage these conditions. The prosecution, however, opposed the petition, presenting reports from government medical boards that concluded Asaram could be treated within the state. The Supreme Court dismissed the bail plea.

His representation was strictly professional, focusing on the constitutional rights of detainees to receive proper medical attention. Ramachandran is recognized within the legal community for his commitment to professional ethics, and his involvement in the case was brief, with the defense subsequently shifting to other senior counsel. His arguments, however, formed part of the ongoing legal record regarding Asaram's health.

Ramachandran continues to practice law in New Delhi, writing and commenting on constitutional issues and judicial reforms. His brief participation in the Asaram case is documented in the Supreme Court's orders. His arguments regarding medical rights are still referenced in legal discussions surrounding the treatment of elderly prisoners in the Indian justice system.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-093
Jurisdiction
Key figure
Sealed
Public record
Status
Active · public