▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-175 · Parents of Deepesh and Abhishek Vaghela (Collective)
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-175AF-LDG-175
Victim · IntimidationRecord AF-LDG-175

PARENTS OF DEEPESH AND ABHISHEK VAGHELA (COLLECTIVE).

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Family member

Ahmedabad, Gujarat

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
2008-07-05
Followed up
Fought case through multiple c...
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
02
Verifiers
02
Last revision
21 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
The parents of Deepesh and Abhishek Vaghela have waged a collective, fifteen-year legal battle against Asaram Bapu's trust following the 2008 gurukul deaths. The families have staged protests and filed multiple appeals, rejecting official reports that cleared the cult's leadership.
On record

This collective refers to the parents of Deepesh and Abhishek Vaghela (specifically fathers Praful and Shantilal Vaghela and their spouses), who are related as brothers and resided in Ahmedabad. Following the mysterious deaths of their sons at the Motera gurukul in July 2008, the families united to lead a campaign against the Sant Shri Asaramji Bapu Trust.

The collective organized the initial protests that shut down parts of Ahmedabad in 2008, demanding a CBI investigation and the arrest of the gurukul administrators. They testified before the Trivedi Judicial Commission, presenting arguments that the boys had been murdered and that the ashram had covered up evidence. They also rejected the commission's 2019 report clearing Asaram Bapu, describing it as a political whitewash.

The families funded their collective legal battle through personal savings and contributions from local supporters. They filed multiple appeals in the Gujarat High Court and sessions courts, challenging the CID's decision to charge the ashram officials only with negligence rather than murder. Their legal campaign continued for over fifteen years, representing a persistent challenge to the trust's administrative impunity.

In early 2025, the Ahmedabad sessions court rejected their final plea for a CBI probe, but the families declared that they would continue to seek justice. The collective's struggle is recognized as a key example of parental resilience, serving as a precursor to the subsequent legal actions that eventually dismantled the godman's spiritual empire. They continue to reside in Ahmedabad.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-175
Jurisdiction
Victim · Intimidation
Sealed
Public record
Status
On record