▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-123 · Kirti Ahuja
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-123AF-LDG-123
Key figureActive · publicRecord AF-LDG-123

KIRTI AHUJA.

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Defense lawyer, Supreme Court lawyer

New Delhi, Delhi

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
15 Aug 2024
Followed up
FIR 20 Aug 2024
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
00
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
Kirti Ahuja is an advocate practicing in the Supreme Court of India who represented Asaram Bapu in post-conviction appeals. In 2024, Ahuja alleged significant procedural deficiencies and gaps in the trial proceedings, claiming they led to a potential miscarriage of justice.
On record

Kirti Ahuja is an advocate practicing in the Supreme Court of India, specializing in criminal appeals and post-conviction remedies. In 2024, she was retained by Asaram Bapu's legal trust to review the Jodhpur and Gandhinagar conviction records and draft comprehensive appeals to challenge the verdicts in the higher courts, focusing on identifying gaps in the prosecution's evidence.

Ahuja's legal strategy focused heavily on alleging procedural deficiencies in the trial courts. In public comments and court filings, she argued that the trial judges had ignored material contradictions in the testimonies of key witnesses and minor survivors. She contended that the lack of corroborative forensic evidence and the delay in filing the complaints were not properly evaluated, creating a strong case for review.

She also highlighted the intense media focus surrounding the trials, arguing that the public trials had created an environment where the defense's arguments were dismissed without due consideration. Ahuja asserted that the right to a fair trial, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, had been compromised by the pressure to secure a conviction against a controversial public figure.

Ahuja continues to represent Asaram Bapu's interests in various appeals seeking suspension of sentence and medical bail, working with senior counsel to present petitions in the High Courts of Rajasthan and Gujarat. Her work is recognized as part of the ongoing, long-term legal campaign by the godman's trust to challenge the historic convictions. She continues her practice in New Delhi, handling various criminal matters.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-123
Jurisdiction
Key figure
Sealed
Public record
Status
Active · public