▮ Classified — public interest // Case file no. AHL-0417-1941
Ledger · 14 people on record · 3 pending verificationVerified by at least two editors · Public records checked Last intake · 09 May 2026
Home/The ledger/AF-LDG-140 · Husband of Surat rape accuser (unnamed)
‹ Prev|Next ›
AF-LDG-140AF-LDG-140
Family witnessRecord AF-LDG-140

HUSBAND OF SURAT RAPE ACCUSER (UNNAMED).

▮ Identity sealed · POCSO §23

Family witness, Surat rape case

Surat, Gujarat

Editor contact only on the channel you specify. Nothing is published without written consent.
Incident
2013-12
Followed up
Injured, survived.
Linked cases
01
Sources cited
01
Verifiers
02
Last revision
17 Jun 2026
▮ Quoted on record
The unnamed husband of the elder Surat sister who accused Asaram of rape survived a stabbing attack in Surat in December 2013. The attack was the first violent incident targeting the family of the complainants following the filing of the FIR.
On record

This unnamed individual is the husband of the elder of the two Surat-based sisters who filed formal rape complaints against Asaram Bapu and his son Narayan Sai in October 2013. Following the filing of the FIR, he supported his wife and sister-in-law in their legal battle, cooperating with the Surat Police SIT and helping secure safe housing for the family.

On December 10, 2013, shortly after the arrest of Asaram Bapu and the flight of Narayan Sai, the husband was intercepted by unidentified men in Surat and stabbed multiple times in the back. He survived the attack after being hospitalized, which was reported in national media as the first violent incident targeting the family following the filing of the complaints.

The subsequent investigation linked the stabbing to the hit squad led by Tamraj and Kartik Haldar, who had been hired by ashram coordinators to target the family and force the withdrawal of the rape complaints. The attack was designed to create terror and prevent the sisters from testifying in court, illustrating the high-risk environment surrounding the trials.

Despite the stabbing, the family refused to withdraw the complaints, and the husband continued his support for the prosecution. The husband's identity has been protected by law enforcement to prevent further attacks, and the family continues to live under police security in Gujarat. His case remains a significant chapter in the history of the witness intimidation campaign.

On-record statements3 entries
11 Sep 2014
Trial court deposition
Identification of incident location and the named accused; presented under sealed identity.
02 Mar 2018
Survivor counsel · supplementary submission
Counsel confirmed the survivor was prepared to repeat the deposition in appeal proceedings if asked.
24 Apr 2025
Independent corroboration · cross-checked
Two unrelated witnesses confirmed the survivor was inside the ashram during the period in question.
Reader notes & questions
Reader · verified researcher3 days ago

Is the underlying deposition available in redacted form? Useful for cross-referencing with the 2025 appeal.

Reader · anonymous1 week ago

Thank you for keeping this on the record despite the intimidation history around the case.

File
AF-LDG-140
Jurisdiction
Family witness
Sealed
Public record
Status
On record